2019-11-15 20:44:58|大红鹰心水坛 来源:中国江苏网


  Good morning.

  (Here’s the sign-up, if you don’t already get California Today by email.)

  For weeks, she’s been on a national tour promoting her memoir. This month, Politico reported that she shut down her state campaign committee and donated the rest of the money she raised for a California race, about million, to causes including the Coalition for Humane Immigrant Rights and a foundation that helps firefighters.

  But only as of yesterday — not coincidentally, Martin Luther King’s Birthday — was it official: Senator Kamala Harris is running for president in 2020.

  She announced her run on “Good Morning America,” not in her hometown, Oakland, as a local radio station’s sources had predicted earlier. She will, however, hold a rally there on Sunday.

  “The core of my campaign is the people,” Ms. Harris said later in the day at Howard University, the historically black college she attended in the 1980s. “Nobody is living their life through the lens of one issue. And I think what people want is leadership that sees them through the complexity of their lives and pays equal attention to their needs. Let’s not put people in a box.”

  Ms. Harris, who is just the second black woman to serve in the U.S. Senate, joins a diverse and increasingly crowded field of Democrats vying for the nomination.

  (Here’s a succinct guide to everyone who’s announced their candidacy and everyone who’s likely to join the scrum.)

  Observers say Ms. Harris, a 54-year-old former California attorney general, could bridge generations of the party, both in terms of her age and experience and her positions.

  While she’s firmly a product of what she once described as San Francisco’s “hard-knocks politics,” Ms. Harris has also tried to align herself with Democrats’ leftward drift. After initially hesitating, she disavowed most corporate donations.

  Still, experts have suggested that her toughest criticism will stem from her time as San Francisco’s district attorney and the state’s attorney general.

  Already, in a stinging Op-Ed piece, a law professor wrote that Ms. Harris wasn’t the progressive prosecutor she claims she was. That prompted a response from a supporter and civil rights advocate who described Ms. Harris as a “voice for the voiceless and vulnerable,” when she was a prosecutor.

  In any case, experts think she’ll try to turn that vulnerability on its head, Politico reported, by presenting her law enforcement background as a foil to a “lawless” presidency.

  (A note: We often link to content on sites that limit access for nonsubscribers. We appreciate your reading Times stories, but we’d also encourage you to support local news if you can.)

  • President Trump offered temporary protections for “Dreamers,” in exchange for .7 billion in border wall funding, as public backlash to the partial government shutdown continues to grow. But the offer was essentially dead on arrival. [The New York Times]

  • And here’s an update on where things stand with the shutdown. [The New York Times]

  • Have California’s reforms aimed at reducing the prison population affected crime rates? It’s a difficult question, but advocates say the state’s efforts over the last decade can serve as a national example. [The New York Times]

  • Striking Los Angeles public schoolteachers will stay off the job today, but Mayor Eric Garcetti said negotiations were going reasonably well. [The Los Angeles Times]

  • Pacific Gas and Electric’s recent woes largely stem from its electric network. But the utility has another big problem: Regulators said the company’s workers, under pressure from bosses, falsified gas pipeline records. [The San Francisco Chronicle]

  • Though women’s marches around the country were smaller than in years past, thousands still turned up throughout California on Saturday. In Eureka, marchers were rained on but not rained out. [The Times Standard]

  • The Army Corps of Engineers is rushing to start the 0 million repair of Whittier Narrows Dam, because it has a high risk of failing and flooding one million Southern California residents in a severe weather event. [Los Angeles Daily News]

  • Bighorn sheep have been dying in the desert and scientists can’t figure out why. [The Desert Sun]

  • Tesla said it would cut 7 percent of its work force as it tries to break out of the niche car market. [Reuters]

  • After two thrilling games — albeit with controversial officiating performances — the Rams will face the Patriots in the Super Bowl. It’ll be a game of ages, with Jared Goff, taking the field as one of the game’s youngest starting quarterbacks, and Tom Brady, beating his own record as the Super Bowl’s oldest starting quarterback. [The New York Times]

  • “We’ve touched every blessed thing in that house — three generations of stuff. We know how to store it, how to find it again, and how to enjoy all of our things.” A Lomita couple who were on Marie Kondo’s Netflix show, “Tidying Up,” talk about keeping up the KonMari method. [Los Angeles Magazine]

And Finally …

  This morning, Tracee Ellis Ross and Kumail Nanjiani announced this year’s Oscar nominations. Our Carpetbagger columnist, Kyle Buchanan, wrote earlier about what to expect. Check back here for updates throughout the day.

  Jill Cowan: Is there any possibility the Oscars producers will try to do something splashy and unveil a surprise host between now and the ceremony? You wrote about why the ceremony could be better off without one.

  Kyle Buchanan: I’m doubtful we’ll get a full-blown host, but I think the Academy is searching for big-name presenters who may get expanded duties — more than just reading light patter and standing to the side. I’d expect producers to announce those names once they’re locked in, since without a host out there giving interviews, the Oscars will need somebody to promote. Then again, the Academy has fumbled more than a few of their announcements over the past year, so maybe they’ll just keep mum and we’ll tune in with no idea what to expect.

  Is there a way you’ll be gauging whether the Academy has been responsive to #OscarsSoWhite criticism?

  I think the #OscarsSoWhite conversation continues to be had in every part of the industry, not just the awards sector. Last year had some amazing movies directed by and starring people of color — among them, “Black Panther,” “If Beale Street Could Talk,” “Crazy Rich Asians,” “Widows” and “BlacKkKlansman” — and while not all of them found favor with Oscar, I think all the talk we’ve been having about representation has had a profound effect on what gets greenlit in Hollywood. And hopefully, with movies like “Black Panther” and “Crazy Rich Asians” having done so phenomenally well at the box office, Hollywood has an incentive to keep backing projects like this.

  And last one, just to ask: Your Best Picture winner prediction? You wrote about whether “Roma” can win, but it definitely has some obstacles.

  This has got to be one of the most wide-open Best Picture fields I can remember. “A Star Is Born” was nominated by every guild, and is the sort of film Oscar voters usually go for — a critically acclaimed hit that’s about the entertainment business — though it hasn’t been able to take home a big prize yet. “Roma” is the critics’ favorite and Netflix is spending through the nose, but a foreign-language film has never won Best Picture, let alone a black-and-white one distributed by a streaming service. And then there’s “Green Book,” which recently took the top prize from the Producers Guild of America, the group that has the most sterling record for presaging the ultimate Best Picture winner.

  California Today goes live at 6:30 a.m. Pacific time weekdays. Tell us what you want to see: CAtoday@nytimes.com.

  Jill Cowan grew up in Orange County, went to school at U.C. Berkeley and has reported all over the state, including the Bay Area, Bakersfield and Los Angeles — but she always wants to see more. Follow along here or on Twitter, @jillcowan.

  California Today is edited by Julie Bloom, who grew up in Los Angeles and graduated from U.C. Berkeley.



  大红鹰心水坛【我】【出】【门】【的】【时】【候】,【在】【就】【坐】【在】【石】【头】【那】【里】【哭】。 【旁】【边】【的】【草】【丛】【挡】【住】【了】【他】,【只】【能】【隐】【隐】【约】【约】【看】【到】【一】【个】【弯】【腰】【的】【人】【影】。 【他】【坐】【在】【石】【头】【上】,【上】【身】【弯】【下】【来】【伏】【在】【腿】【上】,【两】【只】【小】【手】【环】【着】【脑】【袋】,【好】【像】【不】【想】【让】【人】【看】【见】【他】【在】【哭】【泣】。 “【怎】【么】【了】【吗】?”【我】【走】【了】【过】【去】。 “【没】,【没】【什】【么】,”【他】【听】【到】【声】【音】,【连】【忙】【在】【那】【里】【擦】【眼】【泪】,“【只】【是】,【只】【是】【突】【然】【有】【些】【伤】

  “【白】【长】【老】,【真】【是】【稀】【客】。” 【简】【陋】【的】【静】【室】【里】,【主】【客】【二】【人】【相】【对】【而】【坐】。 “【不】【愧】【是】【红】【姬】【长】【老】,【无】【论】【什】【么】【鸟】【儿】、【雀】【儿】,【只】【要】【飞】【进】【了】【容】【州】【地】【界】,【你】【总】【是】【第】【一】【个】【知】【道】。”【白】【先】【生】【笑】【着】【奉】【承】【道】。 【红】【姬】【的】【风】【寒】【还】【没】【有】【痊】【愈】,【精】【神】【也】【不】【太】【好】。 【强】【撑】【着】【病】【体】【来】【见】【客】【的】【她】【实】【在】【无】【法】【对】【眼】【前】【这】【副】【虚】【伪】【的】【嘴】【脸】【生】【出】【几】【分】【好】【感】。 【更】【何】【况】

  【楚】【芊】【荨】【来】【到】【燕】【城】,【已】【经】【有】【一】【年】【之】【久】,【此】【时】,【梦】【魇】【森】【林】【中】【的】【何】【楠】,【伤】【势】【恢】【复】,【报】【仇】【的】【心】【思】,【更】【加】【强】【烈】,【正】【准】【备】【带】【大】【军】【来】【袭】。 【只】【是】【多】【次】【等】【待】【的】【上】【神】【旨】【意】,【却】【迟】【迟】【未】【到】,【他】【主】【动】【询】【问】,【得】【到】【的】,【却】【是】【一】【个】【按】【兵】【不】【动】【的】【消】【息】。 【后】【来】【何】【楠】【受】【伤】,【便】【也】【就】【正】【好】【按】【兵】【不】【动】,【养】【精】【蓄】【税】,【等】【待】【一】【个】【好】【时】【机】,【如】【今】【过】【去】【一】【年】,【伤】【势】【已】

  【风】【雪】【对】【这】【回】【答】【很】【不】【满】【意】,【气】【鼓】【鼓】【问】:“【只】【是】【比】【她】【好】【看】?” 【顾】【铭】【机】【灵】,【立】【马】【改】【口】:“【不】!【你】【比】【这】【世】【上】【的】【任】【何】【女】【孩】【都】【好】【看】。” 【两】【人】【微】【笑】【对】【视】,【彼】【此】【的】【眼】【睛】【里】【都】【只】【有】【对】【方】,【空】【气】【里】【也】【弥】【散】【一】【抹】【甜】【味】。 【此】【时】,【许】【成】【语】【还】【不】【知】【道】【陆】【思】【的】【心】【境】【变】【化】,【他】【沉】【默】【着】【走】【过】【来】【时】,【恰】【好】【听】【到】【这】【两】【人】【的】【对】【话】。【他】【知】【道】,【自】【己】【和】【陆】【思】【还】

  “【就】【这】【样】?”【徐】【然】【不】【愿】【意】【相】【信】。 “【你】【想】【求】【得】【她】【的】【谅】【解】,【还】【想】【好】【好】【照】【顾】【她】,【这】【一】【切】【的】【前】【提】【是】【她】【愿】【意】。【她】【要】【是】【不】【愿】【意】,【你】【做】【的】【一】【切】【都】【是】【强】【求】,【她】【的】【身】【体】【不】【比】【你】【好】【多】【少】,【想】【气】【死】【她】【很】【容】【易】。” 【沈】【芩】【有】【些】【不】【明】【白】,【他】【这】【样】【聪】【明】【的】【人】,【竟】【然】【会】【因】【为】【这】【种】【事】【情】【而】【反】【复】【无】【常】:“【你】【好】【好】【养】【着】【吧】,【我】【带】【小】【鹿】【出】【去】【吃】【东】【西】。” 【不】大红鹰心水坛【央】【视】【网】【消】【息】:24【年】【前】,【广】【西】【来】【宾】【市】【象】【州】【县】【原】【马】【坪】【乡】【龙】【兴】【村】【发】【生】【一】【起】【驾】【车】【撞】【人】【致】【死】【案】【件】,【司】【机】【覃】【某】【龙】【案】【发】【后】【逃】【逸】,【仿】【佛】【人】【间】【蒸】【发】【般】【消】【失】【得】【无】【影】【无】【踪】。【今】【年】11【月】【初】,【警】【方】【经】【过】【长】【期】【排】【查】,【将】【覃】【某】【龙】【抓】【获】【归】【案】。

  【传】【送】【云】【沉】【思】【了】【片】【刻】【道】:“【非】【也】【非】【也】。” “【司】【命】【星】【君】【只】【能】【为】【修】【为】【不】【超】【过】【他】【的】【所】【有】【生】【灵】【编】【写】【命】【数】,【而】【且】【编】【写】【的】【命】【数】【还】【不】【能】【有】【违】【天】【道】,【否】【则】【会】【遭】【天】【谴】。” 【青】【绿】【罗】【裙】【仙】【友】【恍】【然】【大】【悟】【道】:“【也】【就】【说】【如】【果】【小】【仙】【的】【修】【为】【有】【朝】【一】【日】【能】【超】【越】【司】【命】【星】【君】,【便】【可】【以】【自】【行】【编】【写】【命】【数】【吗】?” “【非】【也】【非】【也】,【若】【超】【越】【了】【司】【命】【星】【君】【的】【编】【写】【范】【围】【则】

  【莫】【巳】【末】【简】【直】【不】【敢】【相】【信】,【居】【然】【有】【人】【能】【够】【在】【百】【米】【之】【外】【听】【见】【自】【己】【的】【动】【静】!【自】【己】【分】【明】【任】【何】【声】【音】【都】【没】【有】【产】【生】,【不】【论】【是】【移】【动】【时】【亦】【或】【者】【停】【下】【时】,【她】【都】【没】【有】【发】【出】【任】【何】【的】【声】【音】! 【除】【非】【前】【面】【的】【那】【个】【十】【七】【岁】【的】【小】【男】【生】,【能】【够】【在】【百】【米】【之】【外】【听】【得】【见】【自】【己】【在】【树】【枝】【上】【进】【行】【跃】【动】【时】,【脚】【底】【与】【树】【皮】【进】【行】【摩】【擦】【的】【微】【弱】【到】【不】【能】【再】【微】【弱】【的】【声】【音】 【可】

  【林】【高】【帆】【此】【时】【仗】【着】【木】【玉】【璧】【之】【力】,【也】【奋】【而】【跃】【向】【上】【空】。 【乐】【羽】【见】【林】【高】【帆】【来】【势】【汹】【汹】,【连】【忙】【避】【开】,【他】【喊】【道】:“【你】【当】【真】【要】【和】【我】【拼】【命】?【水】【玉】【璧】【与】【你】【何】【用】,【为】【何】【你】【千】【方】【百】【计】【阻】【挠】?” “【我】【只】【知】【道】【若】【是】【水】【玉】【璧】【落】【入】【你】【手】,【江】【湖】【绝】【不】【会】【太】【平】。”【林】【高】【帆】【正】【义】【凌】【然】【道】。 “【你】!【若】【是】【平】【时】,【我】【必】【毫】【不】【犹】【豫】【将】【玉】【璧】【交】【给】【你】,【不】【过】【现】【在】

  【水】【木】【之】【阵】【已】【破】,【山】【涧】【有】【一】【方】【山】【林】【出】【现】,【有】【个】【少】【年】【男】【子】【出】【现】【在】【这】【方】【山】【林】【丛】【的】【台】【阶】【山】,【台】【阶】【上】【有】【颗】【颗】【珍】【珠】【一】【样】【的】【冬】【露】【闪】【闪】【泛】【亮】。 【当】【天】【站】【立】【在】【这】【方】【山】【林】【之】【中】,【恢】【复】【了】【健】【全】【的】【意】【识】【以】【后】,【他】【听】【见】【从】【这】【山】【林】【之】【中】【已】【经】【传】【出】【来】【一】【些】【嘈】【杂】【的】【声】【音】。 【那】【嘈】【杂】【的】【声】【音】【究】【竟】【是】【什】【么】【样】【的】【声】【音】,【他】【仿】【佛】【能】【听】【的】【明】【白】,【一】【瞬】【间】,【他】【的】【身】【子】【一】